From Networking to Ecosystem Building
Why collecting contacts is not the same as building a connected ecosystem.
A business card collected at an event is not a relationship. A long contact list is not an ecosystem. The gap between the two is where most networking effort quietly goes to waste.
Connected Ecosystems
A room full of influential people is not necessarily an ecosystem.
Across the world, networking has become a central feature of professional and economic life. Conferences bring together policymakers, investors, entrepreneurs and business leaders. Digital platforms make it possible to connect with thousands of professionals across borders.
Yet the number of connections we accumulate tells us surprisingly little about the value those connections create. A successful networking event might generate hundreds of introductions. A successful ecosystem enables people to work together long after the event ends.
Networking optimises for volume: more introductions, more events, more names collected. Ecosystem building optimises for structure: which relationships exist, how strong they are, and whether they actually move knowledge, capital and opportunity between people.
A dense contact list with no real trust behind it is not an asset. It is an illusion of connection that collapses the moment someone needs a genuine favour, introduction or investment of time.
Ecosystems are built through repeated, purposeful interaction—not a single exchange of details.
That means treating connection as an ongoing practice: following up, making introductions without being asked, and investing in relationships before you need anything from them.
A connected ecosystem is one where:
- introductions are made deliberately, not left to chance encounters;
- trust is built before it is tested;
- value flows in more than one direction;
- the network keeps working even when any single relationship goes quiet.
The Difference Between Access and Connection
Networking is often transactional. Ecosystems require something more enduring.
Someone attends an event hoping to meet a potential client, investor, employer or partner. There is nothing inherently wrong with this—relationships frequently begin through individual interests.
But ecosystems require a shared capacity to exchange knowledge, mobilise resources, solve problems and create value.
In 2022, Raj Chetty and colleagues published research in Nature examining social capital using data on approximately 21 billion Facebook friendships in the United States. They found that economic connectedness—friendships between people from different socioeconomic backgrounds—was strongly associated with upward income mobility. Other network characteristics did not show the same relationship.
The research was conducted in the United States and should not be presented as direct evidence of identical effects across African markets. Nevertheless, it provides an important insight: the composition of networks can matter more than their size.
The Problem With Closed Networks
Many professional networks are built around similarity.
People connect with those who attended the same universities, work in comparable institutions, occupy similar positions or already move within the same circles. These networks can be effective at reinforcing trust and providing support—but they can also reproduce existing inequalities.
Chetty and colleagues distinguish between opportunities for people from different backgrounds to encounter one another and the likelihood that those encounters develop into friendships. Their findings suggest that both exposure and the tendency to form connections within familiar groups help explain gaps in economic connectedness.
For ecosystem builders, this raises a practical challenge: how do we create meaningful interactions between people who would not otherwise meet? A startup founder may need access to an experienced industrial executive. A young professional may benefit from an established leader outside their immediate industry. A university researcher may need a commercialisation partner. The value lies in bridging these gaps.
An Ecosystem Needs More Than Events
Networking creates introductions. Ecosystem building creates the conditions for sustained collaboration.
- Purpose. Participants should understand the challenges or opportunities around which they are connecting.
- Diversity of participation. An ecosystem composed of one professional category struggles to address challenges requiring multiple forms of expertise.
- Continuity. Relationships require follow-up, repeated interaction and opportunities to demonstrate reliability.
- Practical mechanisms for collaboration. Mentorship programmes, working groups, shared projects, referrals, knowledge exchanges or investment-readiness initiatives.
- Accountability. An introduction that never leads anywhere should not automatically be counted as a successful ecosystem outcome.
Measuring What Happens After the Introduction
Traditional networking metrics emphasise attendance, membership and reach. AjoAje proposes complementing them with:
- Meaningful introductions that develop into ongoing relationships.
- Mentorship engagements sustained over time.
- Partnerships that result in implemented activities.
- Opportunities accessed by previously disconnected participants.
- Knowledge, resources or expertise shared across sectors.
- Collaborations that continue independently of the original convenor.
These are proposed performance measures, not a claim that a universal ecosystem measurement standard already exists. The objective is to move beyond activity counts towards evidence of value creation.
The AjoAje Perspective
Africa has no shortage of professional gatherings, networks or platforms.
The opportunity is to connect these activities more effectively, reduce duplication and create pathways through which relationships become practical cooperation.
An ecosystem should not depend indefinitely on one person making every introduction. Over time, participants should develop the trust and confidence to connect, collaborate and create opportunities for one another.
The ultimate achievement of an ecosystem builder is not becoming indispensable. It is building an ecosystem capable of creating value beyond its founder or convenor.
“Networking collects names. Ecosystem building creates value between them.”
The AjoAje question: if our next networking event disappeared, would the relationships and opportunities it created continue to grow?
— AjoAje Insights
Key Takeaways
- Volume is not value. A long contact list without trust behind it rarely translates into real opportunity.
- Composition matters more than size. Chetty et al.'s 2022 Nature research links economic connectedness—not network size—to upward income mobility.
- Structure matters more than reach. A smaller, well-connected network often outperforms a large, shallow one.
- Ecosystems require maintenance. Relationships need ongoing investment, not a single interaction at an event.
- Reciprocity sustains networks. Value has to flow in more than one direction for a network to last.
Evidence base: Chetty et al., Social Capital I and Social Capital II, Nature (2022).
Related Insights
Why Relationships Are Infrastructure
How trusted relationships enable opportunity, collaboration and economic value.
Building Between Public and Private
What effective cross-sector collaboration requires beyond meetings and MoUs.
Explore the Insights Repository
Browse every AjoAje Insight, organised by theme.
Subscribe
Learn. Share. Apply. Build. Multiply.
Get new AjoAje Insights on leadership, ecosystems, investment and Africa's role in the world, delivered to your inbox.